Page Section: Centre Content Column
DP v Ms Sisson, Mr Scott and Mrs Scott (Ohope Lodge)
Human Rights Review Tribunal, 10 August
2007
On 10 August 2007 the Human Rights Review Tribunal made a number
of declarations that a consumer's rights had been breached as a
result of a poor standard of care received whilst resident at Ohope
Lodge Rest Home.
The Consumer's Condition
On 3 October 2001, Mrs Brownlie, aged 83 was admitted to Ohope
Lodge, a 30-bed rest home. She had a compression fracture in her
spine. She also had compromised skin integrity and was at risk of
developing pressure sores.
The clinical care provided to the residents of Ohope Lodge was
planned and assessed by Judith Sisson, who was a registered
psychiatric nurse. Her registration applied only to mental health
nursing and so she was practising outside her scope of
practice.
Mr Daniel Scott, also a registered nurse, was the Manager of
Ohope Lodge, and his wife, Mrs Cassandra Scott and he were the
licensees of Ohope Lodge.
On 1 November 2002, thirteen months after admission, Mrs
Brownlie's progress notes record that she had a small pressure sore
on her back. Thereafter her condition gradually deteriorated, with
further pressure sores developing on her right heel, her bottom,
her left hip and her left shoulder. Following review by the
general practitioner, on three occasions during the next six
months, antibiotics were prescribed for infection.
Between 20 March and 28 March 2003, it was noted that Mrs
Brownlie had chest pain and significant exudates, and was calling
out whenever turned.
On 1 April 2003, a different GP reviewed Mrs Brownlie and
requested a review by the District Nursing team. The District Nurse
who attended on 3 April 2003 described a pressure sore on Mrs
Brownlie's hip as being 11cm x 5cm, black, necrotic and full
thickness to subcutaneous fat. On the left hip there was a sore
that measured 4cm by 3cm, had a moderate exudates and its depth was
to the muscle/fascia. The one on Mrs Brownlie's sacrum was
described as 4cm x 3cm, with moderate exudates. Pain was noted on
dressing changes.
As a result of a reassessment of the level of care required, Mrs
Brownlie was transferred to another rest home and hospital on 8
April 2003, by which time she had limb contractures, likely as a
result of the pain she was experiencing. It was recorded that
she had pressure areas on her left hip, left buttock, right hip,
lower left leg and left heel. The sores variously had purulent and
offensive exudates, necrotic areas and sloughiness. Mrs Brownlie's
condition gradually deteriorated and she died on 7 May 2003.
Rest Home Obligations
Until 1 October 2002, rest homes were licensed under the Old
People's Homes Regulations 1987 and, at all relevant times, Ohope
Lodge was licensed under these regulations. The following
regulations and standards were applicable:
Regulation 37 - Obligations of a licensee and
manager
(1) Every licensee of a home
shall take all reasonable steps to ensure at all times -
…
(c) That the home has an
adequate procedure to assess the health needs of each resident on
admission to the home, and that the home continues that assessment
procedure while the resident remains in the home;
(2) Every manager of a home
shall take all reasonable steps to ensure at all times -
(a) That the residents are
adequately cared for with respect to their everyday needs;
…
At that time the Ministry of Health Standards of Care for Old
Peoples' Homes (1987) were in place. They provided:
Standard 2
The main task of the licensee, resident manager, and all the
staff is to provide for the care and comfort of those living in the
home. …
Provide a safe, competent, but flexible service for your
residents. …
…
Standard 8
The licensee or resident manager should develop programmes of
orientation and continued learning for staff. …
- Keep your staff up to date with knowledge about caring for the
elderly. Include:
- the ageing process
- the needs of the elderly - physical, emotional, intellectual,
social and spiritual …
- Encourage staff to attend seminars, workshops and training
courses locally, regionally and nationally.
In 2002 the Ministry of Health brought in a new contract with
providers for the purchase of age-related residential care services
("the National Contract"). The National Contract was signed
by Mr Scott as Manager on behalf of the rest home on 19 December
2002.
On or about 5 November 2002 the Ministry of Health undertook a
routine audit of Ohope Lodge. Deficiencies were noted in the
following areas of the Service Agreement:
- Inadequate pain management policy
- No documented policy and procedure regarding skin
management;
- No documented policy and procedure for wound management;
- Inadequacies in content of Care Plans;
- Inadequate training, orientation and performance
appraisal;
- Requirement that Registered Nurse fulfils the functions
described in D.17.2e of the National Contract.
Clause D17.2e of the Ministry of Health National Contract for
Age Related Residential Care Services provided that the second
defendant must employ at least one Registered nurse, excluding a
registered psychiatric nurse, to be responsible for developing
and/or reviewing Care Plans, providing and supervising care,
fulfilling an educational role, monitoring the competence of other
nursing and care staff, advising management of the staff's training
needs, and assisting in the development of policies and
procedures.
On or about 9 January 2003 the Ministry of Health undertook a
further audit of Ohope Lodge. Included in its report were the
following areas in which there were deficiencies:
- The pain management policy and procedure did not include an
assessment process;
- There was no documented policy and procedure for skin
management;
- The policy and procedure for wound management were not
documented;
- There were inadequacies in the care plans;
- There was inadequate orientation and performance
appraisal;
- The requirement that a Registered Nurse fulfil the functions
described in D.17.2f and D.17.3c of the National Contract had not
been filfilled.
Tribunal Decision
The parties consented to the Human Rights Review Tribunal making
the following declarations:
1. Ms Sisson breached Right 4(1) the Code by failing to provide
services to the consumer with reasonable care and skill, and Right
4(3) by failing to provide services in a manner consistent with her
needs. In particular she:
(a)
as a registered psychiatric nurse undertaking general registered
nurse responsibilities, practised outside her scope of
practice;
(b)
inadequately planned and documented the care to be provided in
relation to nutrition; incontinence, skin management, wound care
and pain;
(c)
used and directed the use of inappropriate wound care products and
equipment;
(d)
failed to involve a wound specialist or occupational therapist or
physiotherapist or dietician;
(e)
failed to undertake a pain assessment or institute a pain
management plan;
(f)
failed to ensure that her own training and that of the staff was
adequate in relation to wound care.
2. The rest home also breached the Code vicariously or directly
as a result of the above.
3. Mr Scott, as Manager, breached Right 4(2) of the Code by
failing to provide services that complied with legal
standards. In particular he:
(a) in breach
of his obligations under point D17.2 of the National Contract for
Age Related Residential Services, failed to employ a registered
nurse excluding a registered psychiatric nurse to take
responsibility for matters under D17 of the Contract.
(b) in breach
of s37(2) of the Old People's Home Regulations 1987, failed to take
all reasonable steps to ensure at all times that the consumer was
adequately cared for with respect to her everyday needs. In
particular he failed to ensure there was adequate care planning,
wound management, skin management, training of staff and
performance appraisals of staff, in particular Judith Sisson.
4. Mr and Mrs Scott, as licensees, breached Right 4(2) of the
Code by failing to provide services that complied with legal and
professional standards. In particular:
(a)
in breach of their obligations under point D17.2 of the National
Contract for Age Related Residential Services they failed to employ
a registered nurse excluding a registered psychiatric nurse to take
responsibility for the matters in D17;
(b)
following Ministry of Health audits, failed to adequately rectify
deficiencies in order to comply with the standards set down in the
National Contract, the Service Agreement, and the Standards of Care
for Old People's Homes, in particular in relation to staff
training, education, orientation, performance appraisal and wound
management.
(c)
failed to comply with their responsibilities under regulation 37 of
the Old People's Home Regulations 1987. In particular they failed
to ensure that an adequate health needs assessment procedure was in
place and continued while the consumer remained in the home.